Saturday, March 26, 2016

ONE OPPOSITION explained in video


Click here to watch the MNLF LECTURE #21 ONE OPPOSITION Explained in Youtube video.

That's my job as consolidator, and making this short video is one step. Lahat tayo sa opposition, share lang natin ang video na eto at viral proportion. We put individual reasons aside, we consolidate as one opposition, because our objective is to defeat the Aquinos.

QUESTION: Paano yung ibang BDP na mahirap kumbinsihin na maki-isa sa OneOpposition?

ANSWER: Ang iConsolidate natin ay yung opposition-minded lang. Yung mga fanatic na individualistic na hindi naman opposition o walang idea (dahil sa kabobohan) kung ano ang opposition, hayaan nyo yan sila kasi mga KKK (kamaganak, kakilala, kaibigan) yan sila or nandyan talaga yan sila kay BinayDutertePoe to reinforce the campaign of the splitters. In the end nitong campaign natin for OneOpposition, talagang may matira pa rin konti kay BinayDutertePoe unless mag withdraw ang kandidato. By the way, aside from recovering the opposition votes from BinayDutertePoe, huwag nyong kaligtaan na ipagpatuloy ang pag post ng MGA criticisms laban sa mga Aquino -- criticise with same issues repeatedly -- walang criticism na naluluma.


QUESTION: Meron bang MNLF member na supporter ni BinayDutertePoe (BDP)?

ANSWER: Yes meron, and the number represents our target workload in the consolidation for the OneOpposition. Meron nga BBM campaigner na supporter ng BDP. Individualistic KKK is very real. The challenge of OneOpposition is to elevate all oppositions to put aside the individualism, and level up their priority for the common goal of the OneOpposition, which is to defeat the AquinoAdministration. Individualism is best applied AFTER the OneOpposition wins, but never before we win. As opposition, we must do a collusive behavior, work together as one to win the pie. We cannot talk about eating our individualistic slices of the pie before the whole pie becomes ours. We get the pie first, together as one, then we partake from it after we succeed in getting it.

QUESTION: How about the OFWs?

ANSWER: Ang splitter ni PNOyAdmin para ma carve out ang OFW and Contract Workers ay si Seneres, but he died before the campaign starts.

INSTRUCTION. Huwag kayong magsayang ng stress at oras sa pag-engage sa discussion, debate, or argument with the online campaigners ng BDP (Binay, Duterte, Poe). Simply share this video in your timeline, page, and groups at least ONCE A DAY. If the BDPs comment in your timeline, page, or group, simply DELETE their comments. We are not after the aggressive BDPs. We are after the Facebookers na hindi engaged sa BDP aggressive political campaigning. Also, in your pages, may settings dyan on privacy, restrict nyo ang Malaysia. Okidoks!

While there is only ONE MINOR REASON why opposition voters will not vote for Miriam, there are, on the other hand, MANY MAJOR REASONS why they will not vote for Binay, Duterte, and Poe (BDP). The consolidation of One Opposition for Miriam Santiago will have least resistance, least bitterness, and least hesitation to those who have to give way, hence most rational.


Monday, March 14, 2016

On Malaysian "peacekeeping force" in Mindanao

Kapag "peacekeepers" dapat civilian hindi military; atsaka dapat UN-sanctioned and UN-commissioned.
Mga loko yan pati color ng UN helmet counterfeit. Yang pinapapasok ni Pnoy dito ay Malaysian military technical assistance yan sa MILF.

Bomb making instructors, military surveillance, and intelligence gathering, and sabotage planners ang mga yan.

Unconstitutional yan, tolerated military espionage yan, treason si PNoy nyan, dapat merong Malaysian VFA Treaty tulad ng US VFA bago magpapasok ng foreign military dito sa Pilipinas.

Kung may armed conflict, UN peacekeepers are military. If no armed conflict, mga civilian peacekeepers na magtulong ng livelihood projects, pag tutor ng mga students, pag bigay ng humanitarian aid. Eh may pinirmahan ng Final Peace Agreement ang MILF sa Malacanang, peaceful na, hindi pwede yang Military ang peacekeepers mo dyan, dapat civilians. Palibhasa kasi counterfeit ng UN yan, kaya ganyan wala sa tamang protocol ng UN

Atsaka hindi naman neutral party ang Malaysia. Malaysia and MILF are one in the same side. It is Malaysia that brainwashes and radicalizes the Filipino Muslims to think that they are Moro-not-Filipino. Klarong klaro na technical assistance yan ng Maalaysia for the MILF. Malaysia is the big-brother of MILF. Kunwari pa peacekeeper. Loko.

Hindi yan peacekeepers. Mga troublemakers yan. Mga instigators yan. Mga agent provocateurs yan. Walang public monitoring, walang performance audit, walang accountability, walang accomplishment reports, walang peace advocacy materials yang mga yan sa tinatagal-tagal na nyan nag-ooperate dito sa Mindanao under the PNoy Administration.

May creeping invasion ang Malaysia dito at gusto ng traydor na Aquino na safe ang mga Malaysian operatives dito.

Kung peacekeepers ang Malaysian forces sa Mindanao, eh ano ang AFP/PNP? Threat ang AFP? Troublemaker ang PNP? Kakalurky!

Yang mga Malaysian forces na yan, yan sila ang nang-harass and pumatay sa mga Pilipino sa Sabah. Kalaban natin yan. Tapos pinapa-pasok lang ni PNoy dito sa Pinas at binibigyan ng privilege to do demonstrate their force here in mainland Philippines. Walang hiya talaga etong PNoy administration -- mas pabor pa sa Malaysia kesa sa Pilipino.

Punyeta! Mas magaling pa kaming mga MNLF mag-isip para sa kapakanan ng Philippine national security kumpara sa mga General ng AFP DND ni PNoy. I want a political appointment in DND pag manalo si Miriam.

In response to the news article titled, "New group of Malaysian peacekeepers arrives".


Q & A


QUESTION: Peacekeepers can be military personnels from other nations, EXAMPLE peacekeepers in Golan Heights. Know your fact! Middleman ang malaysia at part sa agreement ng both parties, galit kayo kasi napag iwanan naman kayo, bawat grupo gusto sila ang mag control ng kalakaran sa mindanao ginagawa nyong rason ang kahirapan, relihiyon, lupa. (JJ Quijano)

ANSWER: Peacekeepers has to work within the UN organization. Yang Malaysian peacekeepers dito ay hindi yan under UN. Malaysia provides funds, technical assistance, weapons, and propaganda assistance to MILF. Malaysia is the Big Brother of MILF. Kailangan neutral and disinterested party ang broker. Hindi pwede Malaysia ang broker, or middleman, or peacekeeper with regards to MILF. Marami naman iba pang bansa dyan, may UN naman, bakit ipipilit ang Malaysia?


Monday, March 7, 2016

The OneOPPOSITION will vote for Miriam

My decisive recommendation as OneOpposition will override all differences of personal preferences among us, the many voters of the opposition. After weighing all factors, I have already recommended that the OneOpposition will put aside all our different personal gusto or preferences, and will all vote as a bloc for Miriam. All of us, undivided, will have to bite the bullet for the supreme interest of the OneOpposition, to vote for one only, for Miriam, that is if we want us, the Opposition, to win. As individuals, we love, we hate, we think, we prefer, we speculate on candidates differently; but as voters in the side of the resistance or opposition, we will all vote decisively as ONE OPPOSITION to WIN.


Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Campaign Rage Meaning

CAMPAIGN RAGE is hostile expression of annoyance caused by tension and despair in political or advocacy campaigning. (new terminology by John R. Petalcorin)


Saturday, December 5, 2015

Proving Bona Fide Intent to Run

COMELEC cancels certificates of candidacies of some who fails to present proof of bona fide intent to run. In my opinion, the filing of Certificate of Candidacy (COC) is the primary proof that a person has explicit intention to run because it is a public document as it is sworn in before a notary public.

The best secondary proofs of bona fide intention to run are his preparations for the campaign, such as (1) formulation of platform and agenda, (2) development of information, education, and communication materials, (3) organizing of supporters' and movements, (4) nominating a bank account that is ready to receive financial donations, and (5) development of campaign plan and strategy.

Never should political party affiliation, even a party nomination, can be used as proof of bona fide intention because there are candidates who choose to be independent, and some candidates who are nominated are mere dummy substitutes.

Never should availability of spendable wealth be used as proof of bona fide intention to run because there is always a facility for campaign contributions for supporters.

It is the absence of fund, whether at the start of the campaign or in the middle, that decreases a candidate's capability to campaign nationwide; but it cannot be used as factor to determine lack of bona fide intention to run.

A candidate's health and old-age may restrain a candidate's capability to attend to rigorous campaign, but it cannot be used as factor to determine lack of bona fide intention to run.


xxxxx

The Commission on Elections (COMELEC) is supposed to be apolitical. Declaring a qualified candidate as nuisant based on subjective popularity perception, unofficial wild guess that the candidate is not winnable, and generalizing a specific profession is an act of prejudice, infringement of rights to run for public post, and political harassment by the COMELEC. Such act is abuse of power because they are virtually puting their personal guess, preference, and opinion above the constitutional rights and above the general electorates' right to choose. Remember, genuine sincerity of intent to run is proven by the candidate's campaign preparation and public pronouncements, not by a mere common wild guess opinion of a third party on the candidates popularity, winnability, and financial speculation.

I debunk COMELEC's opinion that says independency decreases a candidate's capability for such a rigorous and expensive campaign. Such COMELEC opinion is absolutely malicious, a clear act of political intervention that brainwashes the mind of the electorates. It is also an act that somewhat favors the candidates with political parties and discriminates the independent ones.

I believe that political parties neither have monopoly, nor comparative advantage in accessing campaign contributors compared to independent candidates.

Campaign contribution is a political investment. People contribute campaign funds to candidates who have similar advocacy with them. Example, people who are scared if BBL will be passed will put their political investment on candidates who are anti-BBL; so we expect that people who are anti-BBL will not support political parties who are pro-BBL like Liberal Party and its allies such as PDP-Laban. Another example is Malaysia's huge political investment to political parties in exchange of silence on the Sabah issue.

I have 21 Legislative Agenda in the John Petalcorin for Senator campaign. The potential happiness people will get from my legislative agenda translates into 21 reasons why people should invest campaign funds in my national candidacy. I never has problem in formulating my basket of agenda because the interest I have in mind is only my people, my country, and humanity as a whole.

One of the major reason why I hesitate to join coalitions is that a multiple-party scenario is almost always problematic in terms of platform harmonization, they cannot fully agree to a common agenda because they have their own opinion on various issues and each one have their own business interests. This absense of uniformity of agenda in coalitions is also a reason why campaign funders hesitate, for example, an anti-BBL funder may like to put in money into the coalition to support a Presidential Candidate who is anti-BBL, but the same funder may hesitate because that particular Presidential Candidate has some well-known pro-BBL candidates under his or her Senatorial tickets.

Choice of companion and technique determines the level of campaign expenses. Candidates who want to arrive with style and grandeur in the sortie venue by helicopter and bodyguards will spend a much higher campaign fund to compared to the candidate who will only commute alone. The candidate in helicopter may attract the crowd, but voters normally prefer to vote for the candidates with simple lifestyle.

The current development in wireless communication and internet has sharply decreased the financial expenses of wide-scale campaign of candidates who know how to use it. When it comes to field sorties, the political parties and coalitions have huge entourage, more people to coordinate, hence more difficulty in events coordination, bigger logistical problem, and larger financial requirement compared to candidates who prefer to be independents, not to mention they are prone to internal conflict.

The independents, undeniably, have flexibility advantage and least financial requirement because they will usually mobilize a nationwide campaign like a small unit.

xxxxx

Residence address in not enough information needed for COMELEC to contact the candidate. The COC Form should have a space where candidates write their contact information such as telephone numbers, email address, and official Facebook account. It should also have a space for names and contact numbers of three references needed to background investigate the education, work, organization, and next-of-kin of the candidate. Much better if COMELEC will just require the candidate to complete and attach a standard government Personnel Date Sheet Form in his/her COC.


Thursday, July 30, 2015

The politics of disaster

It's not the disaster of natural calamity (earthquake, tsunami, typhoon) that will cause a mass kill after those who will die on-the-spot, but the slow mobilization of help and chaos because of our inability to remove an incompetent leader, moreso if the new leader is the incompetent's anointed one. Ang boto mo hindi yan taya sa sugal na may premyo pag winnable sa political ads and surveys ang binoto mo. Ang maling pagboto ng leader ay maaring ikamatay mo o ng pamilya mo sa panahon ng national disaster. Remember Yolanda.

Fearless words that describe PNoy and his Administration in the past five years as President of the Republic of the Philippines: Aid-redtaper, Buck-passer, Credit-grabber, Shameless, Apathetic, Incorrigible, Impunity, Incompetent, Hoodwink, Rogue, Psychotic, Mobster, Traitor, Malaysian Collaborator, Oligarchy, Elitist, Media-hyped.

ANTI-ROYALTY. The anti-dynasty slogan is soft, I will make it stronger with anti-royalty, not as a legislated measure but as a voting culture. Pag ang magulang ay naging Presidente o Senador na noon, huwag na iboto ang anak na kumakandidatong Presidente o Senador, payuhan na lang na i-invest sa private sector business ang mga kinita nila nung naka-upo pa ang magulang nila. Yang mga magkakamag-anak na dala-dalawa na sa Senado, huwag na iboto yang dalawang pareho, isa lang dapat kada angkan. Walang forever - isang termino lang dapat para parating bago ang naka-upo, ma Presidente man, o Senador, o Congressman, Governor, Mayor. WALANG PAGBABAGO SA LUMANG KANDIDATO. #iBOTOangBAGO


Monday, July 27, 2015

George Soros: By failing to help refugees Europe fails itself

By failing to help refugees Europe fails itself
By: George Soros
Financial Times
July 27, 2015

As many as 400,000 people will make dangerous journeys to reach Europe this year, about half of them fleeing the civil war in Syria or brutal government repression in Eritrea. By the time they reach the west, they will have had to risk their lives twice: once in fleeing their countries, and again in entering ours.

The victims of many previous conflicts have had better luck. After the 1956 Soviet invasion, 200,000 Hungarians fled to Austria and Yugoslavia; within months almost all had been resettled in countries as far flung as the US, Australia, Brazil and Tunisia. A generation later, when war scattered millions in Indochina, the international community resettled 1.3m. In the 1990s, the Balkan conflicts displaced almost 4m people, and again the world helped.

But in the present refugee crisis the EU has failed to act collectively, leading countries to take matters into their own hands. Hungary is building a fence along its border with Serbia. Frontline states are shirking their obligations under the European asylum system, for instance by failing to provide adequate reception and asylum processing capacity, thus encouraging them to move elsewhere in the EU. France and Austria have temporarily reinstated passport controls at borders.

After the Refugee Convention was adopted in 1951, Europe served for decades as its moral and operational backbone. No longer. In May, the European Commission proposed a comprehensive agenda on migration that, if implemented, would give Europeans what they seek — a sense of control over migration flows. In most EU countries, citizens view legal migration positively; it is the chaos at their borders that sends them into the arms of populists.

Yet only two aspects of the commission’s agenda received immediate support: a military mission targeting smugglers in the Mediterranean, which launched last month, and a robust effort to return migrants who are found not to qualify for international protection. The rest of the plan, which aimed to save lives and create livelihoods for those unable to go home, came under attack.

The most resisted idea was a mandatory plan to take 40,000 asylum seekers from Greece and Italy to be processed in other member states. In the end, only 32,000 were accepted on a voluntary basis. The impact on most of those countries would be minimal — and they, too, are likely to be beneficiaries of the relocation principle when migration flows shift. A proposal to resettle 20,000 refugees from camps in the Middle East also proved unattainable.

These programmes embody the spirit of shared responsibility that lies at the heart of the EU. If they do not become permanent and mandatory features of the common European asylum system, it will fall apart. If improved, however, the European asylum system could serve as a model for international co-operation on refugee protection.

Europe must make it possible for refugees to apply for asylum in safety. This does not mean offering protection to everyone in need. But those whom Europe does accept should not be forced to risk their lives. In practice, this would entail allowing people to apply for asylum from abroad. Thousands of Syrian refugees with skills needed in Europe — doctors, nurses, construction workers — languish unemployed in Lebanese and Jordanian camps. The EU could allow them to apply for labour visas.

As it pursues one integrated migration and asylum policy, the EU should eliminate the waste and redundancy of 28 parallel systems. There should be a single European asylum and migration agency, for example, that processes asylum applications for the entire union. Eventually, a joint border guard should be established, too.

The EU’s migration system must be remade to reflect a more collective and generous spirit — and one that is more faithful to European values.