CASE REF# P20180202-152-12. FRAUD PSYCH REPORT AND MALPRACTICE AGAINST DR CECILIA REGINA and DR JAY MADELON-CARCERENY aka Dr JAY CASTILLO-CARCERENY. Rendering professional diagnosis report and expert opinion in court based only on hearsay, without even personally seeing, interviewing, nor meeting the respondent (patient) in person. Malpractice perpetrated in syndication with Atty MELCHOR JAEMOND ARANAS. This PSYCHIATRIC FRAUD will snowball into an expose of syndicated annulment processing scams in the Philippines. For update: Contact person on the development of the case: 0998-8844915.
Atty. Melchor Jaemond A. Aranas, (Roll of Attorneys No 57147) is the lawyer of the annulment case (Declaration of Nullity of Marriage) JDRC Case No 2013-2332-MK. Maria Cynthia Castillejos (Petitioner) versus John Odonnel Petalcorin (Respondent). Atty Aranas lost the case even if the respondent did not lift a finger and just kept quiet in the defense side. It's like a fully armed lawyer Aranas got defeated by a hand-tied tongueless opponent.
From 2013 -2018, the client (petitioner) was made a milking cow of professional fees for four years, but the case was defeated because of, in my opinion, fraudulent psychiatric report against the respondent that the Atty (who else) engineered.
Atty Aranas even foolishly argued that a nose job is proof of narcissism. There is even more foolish than that. Atty. Aranas stupidly argued "incapabily to co-habit" on the husband (respondent) who left the house, even with the knowledge that (1) the husband and wife co-habitted 8 years before marriage and 8 years after marriage, and that (2) the wife (petitioner) had stated that she asked the husband to to leave the house (a separation mutually agreed by the couple).
After losing the case, he filed a Request for Reconsideration that has so many typo errors.
This Attorney's score (in terms of diligence, judgement skills, logical skills, intellectual smartness), in my opinion, ranging from 1-10 (10 being the highest), is 3. In terms of INTEGRITY (not resorting to manufacture of fraudulent evidences), my opinion would score him ZERO (0).
